News and Notices from the Writing Trenches #156…
March 15th, 2018Isaacson’s Leonardo Da Vinci. Whether you’re like me trying to wash out memories of Brown’s The Da Vinci Code or you’re an art lover interested in the man, Isaacson’s book is a fascinating read. I’ll write a review of it sometime soon. Isaacson’s previous biographies should be enough for you to expect great things, but he far surpassed what I expected. You have here a great story about Da Vinci—the man, his art, and his science, a fellow far ahead of his time. We can forget about The Da Vinci Code now.
What catches your eye? Do you mostly take the advice of friends and family when you select a book to read? Many readers prefer to be a bit more independent. If that describes you, what catches your eye? An attractive book cover, a good summary, a peek inside, or reviews and endorsements? (You can peruse all of that online, of course, but maybe it’s more fun in the aisles of your local bookstore?)
Many readers react to at least some of the above. The writer or publisher must provide ALL of the above for ALL readers. (OK, maybe the “peek inside” is automatic.) We often don’t think that publishing a book is complex, but it is. These items represent one facet of a complex process.
Two confusing labels. Ask ten readers what they mean by “literary fiction” or “classic fiction,” and you’re liable to receive ten different answers—or maybe twenty?
I don’t like the tag “literary fiction.” It’s too often used in opposition to “genre fiction,” as if to imply the latter doesn’t have as much literary value. Of course, that negative for genre fiction is balanced by the negative that literary fiction is often considered a miscellaneous genre where we put any title we can’t classify well.
“Classic fiction” is ambiguous too. It’s too often equated to “old fiction” or, more specifically, “pre-21st century fiction.” I suppose if an old book is still being read (a while ago I purchased an ebook version of A Tale of Two Cities, the only Dickens novel I like), it qualifies as a classic. Yet in art or music, a newly discovered Da Vinci drawing or Bach fugue is automatically declared to be a classic.
What’s your opinion?
Speaking of classics…. I wanted to provide my readers with a link to a Rembrandt painting: https://ijr.com/2014/10/183699-famous-artwork-lost-world-war-ii/ “An Angel with Titus’ Features” is the painting featured in my mystery/thriller Rembrandt’s Angel (Penmore Press). It now only exists as a B&W photograph. The Nazis stole the painting during WWII for Hitler’s museum; it never has been recovered. Neither have the paintings from the Gardner Museum in Boston that are featured in The Collector (Carrick Publishing).
If you see any of these paintings, please let the F.B.I. or Scotland Yard know. The art world will thank you. I’m no art critic, but I’ll thank you too. Recently a Degas was discovered when inspecting a suitcase on a train. Art thieves and illegal art dealers are still in business, following the lead of those old Nazis.
Is IBPA a reader’s or author’s friend? The Independent Book Publishers Association has just come out with nine points to define a “hybrid publisher.” I’m suspicious for two reasons: (1) The points actually define an indie publisher AKA small press. We don’t need more confusion in an industry where Big Five sycophants are out to confuse the public into thinking anyone without a traditional contract from a Big Five publisher is a ne’er-do-well who’s not worth reading. (2) The list of points is approved by the Authors Guild, an organization that works hand-in-hand against independent publishers in favor of the Big Five conglomerates that are out to eliminate all new authors who want to make their voices heard.
