Real life is stranger than fiction!
That’s what I often say about incredible current events, especially those associated with political machinations and criminal actions: I can’t write this because no one would believe me—real life is often stranger than fiction. But, in the case of my first published novel, Full Medical, maybe I was prescient, except that things could become much worse than what I portrayed in that dystopian thriller. The theme permeating the entire novel is about the rich elites ensuring the best medical coverage available on Earth at the time at the expense of everyone else. “Full Medical” means full medical coverage, and in that novel only the rich can afford it, but they go far beyond anything seen up until then. I’ll not go into details because I don’t want to spoil the story for you. (It’s the first book in the “Clones and Mutants Trilogy,” by the way.)
The book starts in 2053, so the first thing to point out is that I probably got the date wrong: the healthcare coverage apocalypse described there might occur much sooner. Not only is the GOP talking about doing away with Obamacare (most GOP leaders don’t even like its coverage of preexisting conditions and children up to twenty-six living at home, in contrast to Mr. Trump—who would have thought that he would be more “liberal” than the rest of his party?). GOP members are out to destroy Medicare too, the closest thing we have to single-payer (the correct way to do things).
Instead of the open-ended coverage of Medicare (their words, not mine), they want to set aside X amount of dollars per person (via GOP coupons they’ll call vouchers?), essentially putting a cap on what the government will pay. Once an elder passes that limit, s/he’ll die if any emergency or sickness occurs, unless s/he can pay what doctors and hospitals charge the uninsured. Given that most people over sixty-five are on a fixed income, this will become part of the GOP’s stimulus-to-the-economy programs, namely it will be wonderful for mortuaries and companies making caskets (or will the GOP force cremation?). Unlike Carrier AC, it would be hard to move the death businesses to Mexico or overseas, so they will experience a boom never before seen in the history of this country! (OK, there have been temporary ones from the OK Corral to that night club in Orlando.)
The GOP rank-and-file (emphasis on the first word these days in its other sense) has always had their sights set on what they call entitlement programs, Social Security and Medicare the big two. For them, no one has any rights and aren’t entitled to anything. Gun-crazy wackos are jubilant; pro-life fanatics are rejoicing; racists and bigots are emboldened; Wall Street thinks they can continue their rape of America; and corporations, lobbyists, and special interests are converging upon Washington D.C. like hungry vultures. Big Pharma and healthcare insurance lobbyists are hyenas and part of that carrion-eating crowd. The GOP pack is ready to launch a slaughter on the weak and infirm that will feed the vultures.
Another thing I probably got wrong in Full Medical? The government conspiracy worked behind the scenes. The GOP is more upfront: damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead. They’re very open about their general agenda: increase the wealth of rich elites by screwing everyone else. And senior citizens basically have no defenses and easy prey for the hyenas, so they’ve decided to go after them first—they’re ideal screwees. Same for those who had no recourse to any medical coverage before Obamacare covered them. The GOP mantra has become “To Hell with Them!” I guess America won’t ever be great again for the elderly and other defenseless sectors of the society.
I can’t be happy with this message involving Full Medical; my “I told you so” is bitter medicine (pardon the partial pun). I’m sad. Medicare was put in place for people on fixed income who’d become bankrupt with just one serious illness. People have forgotten how bad it was before. Even the present system contains a lot of unfairness. Because Medicare isn’t completely single-payer (it should be), our elders are still hung out to dry if they can’t afford those expensive supplements. The GOP would return our country to those dark days when the elderly were given a death sentence once they stop working.
I’m also angry. First, I’m angry at all those voters who voted for Trump. While I can understand their frustrations (that seemed to be across the board in this election because both candidates were very unpopular, and for good reasons), they weren’t thinking of the consequences—an emboldened GOP (even though they often dissed their candidate, they’re now looking on the bright side—rather, the dark side—with renewed enthusiasm for doing damage).
Second, I’m angry at all those voters who swallowed the media and party hype that Clinton was going to win in a landslide (the NY Times said Clinton had an 84% probablility of winning!). It’s ironic that the person leading the charge for a recount in those battleground states is Dr. Jill Stein, the Green candidate. All the Dem establishment can do is wring their hands and point fingers at everyone else except themselves. Winning the popular vote doesn’t matter, folks! Anyone could predict that HRC would win that because of population centers like California and the tri-state area, so that’s a moot point (and it will still end up being a virtual tie percentage-wise—the country is so divided that HRC’s goal of a mandate was dead in the starting gate). HRC lost in those battleground states because the Dems didn’t get out the vote there. Historically they’ve been blue, and arrogance made the Dem establishment blind to the danger. But this election was an unusual one, to say the least, and neither the Dem establishment nor the Dem voters should have taken anything for granted.
Did I detest HRC? No. Albeit flawed in many ways, Mrs. Clinton was still the better candidate when compared to Mr. Trump. I spoke out about her flaws—there were many—and how both the Dem and GOP establishment have rigged the primary system (the Dems actually more than the GOP). I wanted a more progressive agenda for America—HRC wanted the status quo. Now we’ll have a conservative and retrograde agenda because GOP fanatics in Congress feel emboldened to launch a payback that will frankly lead to premature deaths for many Americans. Real life is stranger than fiction, and, in the case of my novel Full Medical, it looks like it will become worse much sooner than I imagined. Hopefully they’ll wait until after the inauguration. Killing Medicare (there’s a title for Bill O’Reilly!) would be a terrible Christmas gift for the nation’s senior citizens!
***
The Collector. Most Nazis stole art not out of appreciation but for money—a famous piece can launder many dollars or be used to finance all sorts of things. What they finance here might give you the creeps. Detectives Chen and Castilblanco swim in the dark seas of illegal art in this mystery/suspense/thriller novel. Can they keep from drowning?
And so it goes…
December 13th, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Yeah, we’re ****ed.
The Dems did a terrible job of educating voters in those key swing states about what the Republican victory would mean for them. Most of them still are in denial, although the writing is on the wall (not to mention every other d*** post on Facebook). For example, who would have thought that union members would vote against their own self-interest and would make it possible for someone who will enthusiastically bust up their unions and not just cause wage stagnation, but real wage decreases? But they didn’t know…HRC, the dems and their unions didn’t let them know the consequences, or they didn’t hammer it home; they allowed the rank and file union members to believe the rhetoric that Trump was going to save their jobs. He might do just that, except that those jobs won’t be paying the wages they once paid.
There was an article today about a governor in a state which raised the minimum wage and how much better the employment picture and the economy was doing in that state. I forget which state it was, I just barely looked at the article. But I was thinking about that headline. When you give a poor person or someone who is considered “lower middle class” extra money in their check, what do they do with it? They spend it! Every last dime of it, generally. Which helps the economy, and when businesses are busy, they need more employees to handle the load. What part of that equation is difficult to understand?
Here’s an article about the healthcare thing, if WP will take a link after a long post. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/12/12/505285572/obamacares-demise-could-be-quicker-than-republicans-intend?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=2040
December 13th, 2016 at 1:21 pm
Scott,
Link works, at least for me. Article and your comments show that there might have been too many equations and variables for the dimwit Dems. Just heard that Schumer today is calling for MTA employees to be screened, something the 9/11 report called for. So maybe they’re not dimwits but just buried in their own bureaucracy?
What you point out is so obvious that you have to wonder if HRC and fellow travelers didn’t get the word out because Bernie Sanders suggested it? And he wasn’t the only one that told them. Bill did too! And Michael Moore (no relative). Of course, HRC isn’t really in favor of unions; Sanders is.
Sometimes people get what they deserve, but that leaves the rest of us out in the cold.
r/Steve
December 13th, 2016 at 1:45 pm
I’ve always had mixed feelings about unions. I see the necessity of them, but when we remodeled our office (“remodel” probably isn’t a strong enough term — we gutted our building leaving only the three outside walls and the wall down the middle between our two suites) we ran afoul of the local carpenter’s union. We priced the job with a full union shop, and decided that we couldn’t afford to do it. Then a contractor who did a lot of dental offices was recommended to us, and he came in significantly lower. When we asked him about his pricing, he stated that he used union labor for most of his subcontracted jobs, but his own crew of carpenters who did the demo also was non-union. When discussing it with one of them (their crew chief), he stated that he used to be in the union, but he had his wife’s insurance and he was paid better by this contractor than he was when he was with the union. Yet the job came in about 200K less, and allowed us to proceed. But then we had the union standing out front, with their giant rat, as the work was progressing, and the plumbers and electricians wouldn’t cross the line, setting us back about 6 weeks and costing us quite a lot of money. Not 200K, but if we had known…
This job wouldn’t have been done if we had to use that union shop. There wouldn’t have been any construction. But that didn’t seem to matter to many people.
(I’ve had many people, union carpenters included, comment on the quality of the finish carpentry in our place…so it isn’t a matter of competence either.)
But I recognize their usefulness in maintaining the middle class, and think that if they were a little more realistic about their own worth, they’d be even more useful. When many union skilled workers make more than I do per hour, I feel something’s a little wrong… But they voted to kill their own livelihood…
December 14th, 2016 at 6:43 am
Scott,
Like you, I have mixed feelings about unions. There’s no doubt in my mind they were sorely needed “in the beginning.” Now they are sometimes havens for corruption and incompetence. We should never forget Harry Reid’s legacy: He sat there in the town hall meeting in Nevada with a smirk on his face as Sanders applauded his congressional leadership and then went out and turned the unions against Sanders! That’s political irony–Sanders is a union man and HRC was Wall Street’s darling. Go figure. Here in NJ members of the teachers’ union vote as their union commands. And so it goes….
r/Steve
PS. Sanders would have beaten Trump, but the Dems will never acknowledge that.