Freedom of speech and press – the Mortensen case
Tuesday, April 19th, 2011The first amendment to the Constitution of the U.S. states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or….” Previously, perhaps in several posts, I underlined the point that this proves the Constitution is an evolving, living document that was written to adapt to new situations that would appear in our young democracy, something some sectors of our society and even some obstinate Supreme Court judges deny: This is the first amendment—it wasn’t in the original document.
Today I will focus on those freedoms that deal with publishing—speech and press. While Sixty Minutes (CBS) has suffered the same blows as all network news programs and is in a downward spiral, I still watched the segment last Sunday night about Greg Mortensen. I remember when, several years back now, a colleague at work recommended the book Three Cups of Tea, a heart-warming portrayal of a person trying to do some good in this world. I’ll confess that my first knew-jerk reaction was cynicism. Someone who’s rich enough to go halfway round the world to climb mountains wants to build schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan? I thought, “Either this guy is Paul on the road to Damascus, celebrating a personal epiphany, or he’s a con artist.”