Writing for readers…
Tuesday, October 11th, 2011I generally am happy to see a WD in my mailbox (that’s Writer’s Digest, in case you’re wondering if I’m missing an M). Nevertheless, I’ve always thought the apostrophe is misplaced and lately there has been this nagging suspicion that their editorial board just doesn’t get it. Joe Konrath has a better perspective on the industry (unfortunately, his participation in his blog is going on a hiatus). However, he doesn’t get it completely either.
WD still propagates the myth of legacy publishing (this myth states that an author needs an agent, an editor, publisher, and publicist, with one of the Big Six providing the first two of the last three, the agent taking a hefty cut just for getting an MS , short for manuscript, beyond the slush pile where all unagented MSs go, and the author generally providing his or her own marketing–in other words, he or she can contract the publicist. Joe and others like Barry Eisler have shown that the Big Six publishing houses are now built on sand and moreover have their heads buried in it. Sure, they’re trying to invade and control the new digital paradigm, now revolutionized by eBooks, but they’re choking—they still live their myth and are making badly formatted eBooks at exorbitant prices (one that I will not name created a mini-scandal when people started complaining about formatting and price).