Is PC too oppressive?
Thursday, April 30th, 2015This isn’t a pro-Apple manifesto—I would write just the opposite for that, especially in regards to publishing, but the question in the title means something entirely different than Apple’s present domination of the tech world. What I’m asking is if “political correctness” has been carried too far in general, and whether it inhibits creativity for fiction writers in particular.
Here’s an example that caught my attention: One day last week I saw an announcement for the NY subway system that urged passengers to give up their seats to the elderly or pregnant persons. Innocuous and well-intentioned I suppose, but I burst out laughing. We’ve become so PC that the person (PC justified here) writing this plea used “pregnant person” to make it a unisex statement. I was laughing at the absurdity. Let’s face it, dear reader, be you male or female, you’ll have to agree with me: it’s pretty hard for a male human being to physically become pregnant. (Bruce Jenner and others might psychologically be female, but inner plumbing is what it is.)
We often speak of a pregnant couple; I’d go as far as using that for two gays using a surrogate too. That’s all the more justified by same-sex marriage and equal rights for LGBT couples, something I support because no one’s rights should be trampled on as long as they don’t affect other people’s rights (when they do, a balance has to be sought, of course—none of this denying customer service by saying it’s freedom of religion). We speak of pregnant moments and often use “pregnant” in the same ways we use “fertile.” I just thought that the subway ad writer had carried PC too far and created a situation where absurdity takes over. Instead of celebrating that wonderful state of womanhood, s/he reduced it to unisex triviality. Moreover, it reduced old-fashioned chivalry, mostly absent today, and put pregnancy at the level of the old and infirm, never mind that I’ve seen 85-year-olds in much better shape than I am.