While there’s a lot besides books on Amazon now—it ceased being a reliable bookstore decades ago—and most of it has examples of how big bot Jeff Bezos and his army of little Amazon bots fail consumers (you can add “exploit” and “irritate” to “fail”) as they try to be the marketplace of the world, there are many reasons why Amazon fails authors, so many that authors and readers should avoid Amazon like the plague.

The main reason is that the online service, that started as an electronic bookstore, no longer focuses on selling books! It does try to control book prices and sales to the detriment of the rest of the book industry. It also resells books and sells questionable reprints. Add to that features that are only available if an author or publisher is exclusive to Amazon, and you’ve got to wonder why any author or publisher would deal with Amazon.

Exclusivity has another negative: Although it pretends to also be a book publisher as well as a bookseller, it doesn’t distribute authors and publishers’ books to other booksellers, online or otherwise. There are many retail outlets for books, so authors and publishers can do much better by “going wide,” even if it requires ditching Amazon; i.e., having their books for sale at these many other booksellers a lot of readers frequent. In other words, Amazon is not a book distributor! Instead, it tries to be a monopoly. (I hate it when a reader asks if one of my books is on Amazon as if that’s important. The most recent ones aren’t!)

Another negative against Amazon is Bezos himself, of course. Although I’ll admit it’s hard to measure its negative effects on authors and publishers, Bezos is a card-carrying member of America’s greedy fascist oligarchy. He doesn’t even try to hide this anymore, from supporting the “fucking moron” in the White House (that’s a quote from ex-SecState Tillerson) to his laughable attempt to contribute to the space program where he sells tickets to the filthy rich and his garish and lavish wedding where he took over Venice. (That first wife was smart to give Bezos the boot!) At least Putin’s oligarchs have seaworthy yachts; Trump’s oligarch Bezos built one that couldn’t even make it to sea.

Amazon also ignores customers’ complaints, which is probably the consequence of automation, i.e., the bots and soon-to-be-increased indifference as AI takes over. (For example, the bots got the novels in my “The Last Humans” trilogy mixed up, and I could never reach a human who could fix the problem. I had to give up trying to fix the problem. This is explained in more detail in the list of my books found at this website. I haven’t offered any later novels on Amazon as a consequence. And Draft2Digital does a fine job of going wide, Mr. Bezos!)

Amazon has ruined and will continue to ruin American commerce in general and bookselling in particular if consumers allow it. That’s all on Jeff Bezos! And it’s all on us to battle him! It’s time for all enlightened consumers to boycott Amazon!

***

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

It happens. Arthur C. Clarke imagined comsats long ago; we now have a plethora of them. Isaac Asimov imagined androids and robots long ago too; we now have many of the latter and still fear quality ones of the former (because of a still-prevalent Frankenstein complex?). Versions of AI populate many sci-fi stories, often as villains (remember HAL?); while current models haven’t yet reached the level of what’s been imagined, the anemic and primitive software roll-outs still seem to be all the rage now, the handful of providing companies dominating the stock market.

All this and more relate to some of my own stories, of course, but in this post I want to focus on a recent news item that caught my attention: Google’s claimed advances in creating a quantum computer. From what I saw and read, their efforts looked about as impressive as those first attempts at mainframes now left far behind by the laptop on your desk; they only represent a tiny step forwards despite the hype. (All the cryogenics required seems to imply that we won’t be using a desktop quantum computer anytime soon!)

However, this news item about Google’s efforts made me wonder how fast the advances in quantum computing will make my novel Leonardo and the Quantum Code (#5 in the “Esther Brookstone Art Detective” series) a bit like that old story by Jules Verne, From the Earth to the Moon, relative to last century’s Apollo missions (Verne’s characters traveled to the moon after being shot out of a cannon). Any story featuring future tech can become dated.

In a sense, my novel is a bit like a tongue-in-cheek play (not quite as much as my novel, A Time-Traveler’s Guide through the Multiverse): In Esther’s adventure, an old physics professor, an old friend of Esther Brookstone when she and husband number two Alfred were at Oxford, is motivated by some projection techniques he found in a (yet unknown!) notebook of Leonard da Vinci (the Leonardo of the title, of course) to create clever and super-fast encryption and decryption algorithms for quantum computers. The humorous twist, and the old physicist’s joke on everyone trying to steal those algorithms, is that there are no existing quantum computers; his algorithms can’t be used…yet!

While I know enough about encryption and decryption as well as quantum phenomena to make the story seem real, even though it’s clearly fiction, a bit of sci-fi in a rather unconventional mystery/thriller story, the same question might occur to you as it did to me: How soon might facts overtake my fiction? Better said, how soon will that physics professor’s joke on international spies no longer be valid?

I probably shouldn’t worry. As I said above, Google’s quantum computer looked quite primitive. Moreover, my tale still qualifies as a tongue-in-cheek critique of the Russian and US spy networks as well as the UK’s MI5 competency and research projects. Or, is it just another spy thriller that will eventually become irrelevant with the inexorable advancement of technology? Time will tell.

***

[Note from Steve: Readers might be wondering about two things: Why don’t I provide links to the books mentioned above? And why don’t I show their cover images like I used to do? The first answer is a bit complicated: I’m in the process of merging old Smashwords accounts with Draft2Digital—those two companies’ merger has caused some technical software problems for me (and others, I suppose). Also, space limitations for this blog don’t allow me to archive and use cover images when needed. Technology often works against us!]

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Our current POTUS has used AI to create images of himself feces-bombing some of the many thousands of marchers on “No Kings” day protesting his fascist policies. Of course, his sycophantic MAGA maniacs just laugh that off, ignoring that it’s neanderthal humor and not in the least presidential. That’s one negative example of AI we’ll probably continue to see in the future.

Using AI invaded publishing long before the feces-bombing images of the “fucking moron” (ex-SecState Tillerson’s description of our infamous president, not mine): AI can be told to study any author’s style and mimic it; I know because my son did it to me (it was an abject failure because I don’t have a unique style—it can change from story to story). Both the study (it’s often buried in the “training” of the AI) and the mimicry I deem illegal, although the legal eagles seem slow to pursue that illegality. (And that’s why I put a disclaimer now on every copyright page informing readers that no AI is used in my storytelling—if I can remember to do so! Of course, the copyright itself, any publisher or author’s, should legally prevent the hackers from using the published material with their AI. Pay attention, copyright lawyers!)

POTUS’s tomfoolery represents real danger, though. Political leaders, diplomats, other officials, actors, composers, writers, engineers, scientist, and other creatives can be mimicked and/or abused by using AI; and viewers usually can’t tell the difference! (While the situation is absurd, that AI version of fat-fascist Trump sure looks real and very much like a modern Red Baron!) And this is only using the current AI technology that’s still very primitive. That’s the present situation. Who knows what abuses the future might bring?

I can imagine an AI version of Vladimir Putin swearing peaceful coexistence with AI while bombing the hell out of some European capital with nukes. Or just helping the real Putin spread more lies while tightening his puppet strings on our POTUS? Human beings already have quite a propensity for evil high jinks. AI is yet another powerful tool in their technological tool boxes.

Even now, AI’s negatives far outweigh any of its positives. The province of Ontario used AI to produce visuals and reproduce President Reagan’s spiel knocking tariffs; his words were real, though, and our current POTUS reacted with yet another boorish and childish tantrum and cancelled all future tariff negotiations with one of our biggest trade partners. (I guess he can feces-bomb crowds and laugh about it; but, like most bullies, he can’t take it!) Whether your reaction to the Canadian ad is positive or negative (forget Trump’s—he’s just a pea-brained schoolyard bully) for either Canada or the US, there’s no denying that AI was used as a tool.

The overarching lesson here? In this period of initial and primitive use of AI, your motto should always be “Trust no one and nothing!” because, chances are, your encounter with AI will not be a happy one and often as disgusting as Trump’s created feces-bombing images.

Now, you might ask why didn’t our infamous POTUS just use AI software to hide the fact that he was destroying the famous East Wing of the White House? Was it just his lack of imagination? (Does the “fucking moron” have any, or does he just depend on more intelligent sycophants?) Or is a truly criminal and fascist mind not able to hide his crimes…with AI?

***

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas…without AI!

The so-called “gurus,” those people who claim to know what authors should do to achieve success in publishing, often stress the importance of endorsements and reviews. They’re full of you know what!

I’ve written enough reviews and also received enough for my own books that I can state that they’re basically worthless. Think about it: Do you read a book because some stranger, reviewer X, says it’s a good read? Hell no! You might attempt to read a book if you receive a “review” (often viva vos) from a good friend, someone whose opinions you trust and value; but you’re deluding yourself if you only plow through a book because that stranger says it’s the thing to do, that “everyone else” is also reading it. (By the way, X has nothing to do with slimy and swampy Elon Muskrat! He hasn’t yet been able to take it over yet as a generic symbol for something or someone…yet.)

Don’t get me wrong: I’d rather read a good book than watch most anything on TV. I still love books and hate most other forms of entertainment a little more with each day that passes. I get enjoyment from writing my own stories too—that’s the joy of creation. I know I can tell a powerful story, one that a casual reader of fantasy and romance (J. K. Rowling and Nicholas Sparks’ mass-produced trivia comes to mind) might hate (to each his own, I say).

But I’ll never expect readers to read one of my books because some reader they don’t know from Adam or Eve says it’s the greatest thing they’ll ever read; and, as a reader, I don’t care what a damn critic or reviewer says about a book that grabs my attention either, although I might wonder what their BS means.

Authors starting out sell their souls in their efforts to get a number of “good reviews.” (Some PR and marketing sites even demand a certain number as an additional pound of flesh beyond the their exorbitant fees!) That’s all BS too! It’s as stupid as getting publicity from Oprah (when she was actually pretending to work instead of pandering to Meghan Markle), or getting on the NY Times’s bestseller list. (Who the hell even cares about their damn formula? They’re not Coca-Cola, after all. The Times is a an NYC publisher, so they’re part of that NYC publishing mafia. Forget about all of them and the critics they hire who have never written a damn thing that’s worthwhile!) All an author should do is tell the best damn story they can…and then write the next one! (I’ve done that a few times!)

Simon and Schuster, one of those bloated NYC publishers trying to force people to read their formulaic fiction, recently ended their requirement of “book blurbs”—by the way, they don’t think of them as just summaries of books (how most people define them!), but as endorsements of an author and his book made by other authors who presumably have more “name recognition.” The use of these endorsements has always been just more evidence for a “book mafia.” The latter is comprised of that group of publishers, editors, and the Big Fives’ (mostly NYC publishers) old mares and stallions, who are all comfy in their cushy stables, everyone enjoying the many reciprocal pats on the back as they control the competition and slow down any threatening newcomers who are trying to break into fiction’s elite ranks. I used to ask myself: What does a Baldacci or Deaver get from endorsing another author’s book they probably never read? The answer’s obvious: An endorsement for their own next book! I’m not sure if an endorsement increases the likelihood of traditional book publishing’s demise—it’s already in its death throes—but its incestuous nature certainly can’t help.

Needless to say, I’ve never paid any attention to either reviews or endorsements as either a writer or a reader. I’ve always known enough from a “peek inside” and the book’s blurb (my meaning is “summary”), or the ebook costs so little that I’m willing to take a gamble, that I can decide whether it’s worth buying and reading. (The cost is an indication of quality too—authors like James Patterson exploit other authors and therefore their readers by maintaining an elaborate assembly line that makes Henry Ford look like an amateur entrepreneur.) That filtering benefits me because I can avoid wasting my time reading  a lot of “popular authors” whose plots and prose have become boring, formulaic, and uninteresting trivial rubbish (sometimes that describes their very first book!). So be it. If someone asks if I’ve read so-and-so’s title Y, I often can proudly say no! It also means that I can maintain a high moral standard for my own stories that’s not influenced by greed or pandering to certain sectors of the public that I find despicable.

To those who counter these sentiments by saying that writing is a business, I can reply that writing is an art, and to be true to my art, I must ignore that business aspect as much as I possibly can. Pandering to what few readers are left is a waste of time; pandering to the Big Five’s mafia is prostituting my artistic soul. I’ll do neither one!

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules listed on the “Join the Conversation” web page. If you don’t, I can guarantee you that your comment will never appear.)

“Writing Fiction.” If you’re an author, especially one who’s starting out, I’ve summarized some of the things I’ve learned along my writing journey. If you can believe it, I started before ebooks even existed! Now that’s all I publish (via Draft2Digital/Smashwords), mostly because of what I described above. I often update this sometimes acerbic and often controversial DIY manual, but I originally offered it as a more believable and useful self-help treatise than King’s On Writing that now has only historical value (if that!). Like all my writing, take it or leave it. And, like a lot of my recent writing, it’s a free PDF download. (See the entire list of free downloads on the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page.)

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Progressive protests start with a few concerned and responsible citizens deciding they’ve had enough. I can’t claim to be the first (the EU has been going after Google for a while), but I’ve hated Google for a long time. I finally did something about it.

Long before their kissing Ronald McDonald Trump’s fat McD’s butt and changing their map names (Denali to Mt. McKinley and Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America), Google’s browser Chrome was annoying me a lot. I’d already stopped using Facebook and X; Zuckerberg had proven himself to be a kiss-ass fascist oligarch backing Narcissus le Grand; and that slimy Elon Muskrat, who has no creds as a serious leader or even an elected office and is a complete fascist, lost my support the moment he walked into the X HQ with his kitchen sink. (The Muskrat probably had it lying around one of his penthouses, having replaced it with a gold one, because he’s emulating his fuehrer’s love for gold that represents their fascist greed and desires for power.)

Most progressives more than likely grimaced when they saw those fascist oligarchs sitting there as special invitees to the Donald Jackass Trump’s inaugurations events, the Muskrat not hiding his obsequious attitude with his ubiquitous Hitlerian salutes. And right there among those fascist oligarchs were the owners of Google whose names, like Voldemort, I’ll avoid saying so their evil will not fall upon you!

So, my personal vendetta against Google is because I know these American versions of Russian oligarchs much better than Putin’s. All of them—that Big Bot Bezos, that slimy Muskrat, the arrogant Sugar-Mountain Zuckerberg, etc., these “made men” in the jackass’s mafia—negatively affect my life and yours (if you’re an American) a lot more than Putin’s. But Google’s SOBs were also affecting me, a writer, every day of my writing life.

Their trackers followed me everywhere I went on the internet. Every search produced pages of unwanted ads, allowing Google’s oligarchs to become even richer by selling everyone’s information and ad space in searches to unscrupulous company CEOs just as abusive and greedy as Google’s masters, as if I’d ever buy anything from the bastards!

How did I strike back? There’s not much an author can do, I’ll admit, but I severed all ties with Google! I use DuckDuckGo now. I never used Gmail for my own fiction writing. (AB Carolan needed an address to register his stories with the Big Bezos Bot’s Amazon, which is generally a waste of time. Since I also hate the latter oligarch, readers can now write to AB by using the “Contact Page” at this website. [wink, wink])

As an FYI and added benefit, DuckDuckGo beats the crap our of Chrome! It has new features I’ll use a lot as an author. (For example, I can make both a “printable version” or a “PDF version”  of a web article, ones that are actually readable. Chrome still depends on MS Edge to do the latter, which often produces a damn mess. What? Is Bill Gates part of this evil oligarchy?)

I haven’t begun to explore all the other options available in DuckDuckGo’s dropdown menu and elsewhere, but it’s straightforward search results without Chrome’s annoying ads by themselves is worth the change! (For example, as an author, I might search for old KGB agent Putin’s favorite Russian poisons. Before, I fully expected that I’d receive offers to buy some samples at least for a few days from suppliers in Moscow if I used Google’s Chrome!) If you’re an author who just wants dependable and factual information without pages of annoying and useless ads, don’t use Chrome!

So, bye-bye greedy Google! I’ve been loyal to you since you were an internet infant in nappies. Now you don’t deserve that loyalty because you’ve become an evil adult supporting corporate fascism and terrorism in America, I want nothing to do with you! I hope everyone joins me to choose more honest and less evil internet service providers so that Google goes the way of the dinosaurs! Or straight to hell where they belong with Donald Jackass Trump!

***

Comments are welcome. (Follow the rules listed on the “Join the Conversation” web page…or you’ll never see your comment displayed here!)

Fascism and terrorism. Fascism is a human affliction with symptoms of simple greed and a thirst for power, a mind-destroying illness many psychotic and sociopathic individuals suffer from. Terrorism is its deadliest and most extreme form. Although we are seeing too much of the former in the US and all over the world now (see above), the latter is increasing as well (attacks made by crazed people using cars as weapons, for example). I’ve been fighting the battle against both in my prose from my very first novel, Full Medical, to my last (for now), Fear the Asian Evil, and in most tales in between those two, even those tales geared to young adults (who also need to learn how to fight these deadly social diseases!). All these stories are honest portrayals of the damage fascism and terrorism can do to freedom and peace in the world. Brave people in these stories struggle and fight the good fight, so let them inspire you! (Fascists and terrorists, many of them controlling our own government and companies now, will not enjoy these stories, of course. Their ignorance will return to haunt them because they will pay the price sooner than later!)

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

It’s not just about TikTok. Sure, the Chinese are using it, one, to brainwash its users, especially America’s youth; and two, to collect data about Americans to facilitate that brainwashing and other insidious things. But I saw that early on and never signed up to use it. (I’m paranoid. I don’t believe the fascist MAGA maniacs are the only ones out to get me. Xi’s assassins might be planning their revenge against me for writing Fear the Asian Evil, although the title hides the fact that it’s about Chinese perfidy. LOL.)

Much earlier, though, predating TikTok and Truth Social by years, I began to post on Facebook and Twitter. So-called PR and marketing experts were telling authors even back then that social media was “the thing,” i.e., a wonderful tool to reach out to potential readers. (Now I tend to think that too many people emulate Trump—i.e., they don’t read much and can’t understand what they read.) Some of these “experts” even went so far as to say that a “Facebook page” was more important for authors to have than a website. What BS!

In any case, I continued to participate on Facebook and Twitter (even when the latter became X), but less and less as time went on. I finally realized just how much they provide clear evidence for Musk and Zuckerberg’s fascist tendencies. Walking in with the kitchen sink ended my days on X long before Musk became the super-fascistic cheerleader for Trump’s plan to destroy American democracy. Seeing Zuckerberg’s obvious lack of enthusiasm for stopping Putin and friends’ interference in the 2016 election (fact-checking will now be left to the users) was also sufficient motivation to suspect that SOB’s MAGA proclivities, now in full display as he visits Mar a Lago along with Musk to kiss Donald Jackass Trump’s butt.

It took me less than a half hour to give those two fascists the finger and end my association with their anti-democratic, evil, and oppressive social media creations. Frankly, I can’t understand why any author who lives in and loves democracy and its free speech features that allow us to stick it to fascists and all their autocratic and Machiavellian machinations would use any social media, but especially Facebook and X. An author might as well be bound and gagged and rotting in a prison cell!

What about that famous dialogue authors should have with potential readers, you ask? Forget about it! First, let your artistic creations be your weapons of choice, not social media. Second, it’s not worth losing your integrity (as the Big Five publishing conglomerates and their so-called but rarely “non-political” authors do)—let’s call it “losing your soul to fascism”—by pandering to people who don’t give a rat’s ass about what’s right and wrong, only greed and power. (That’s basically the definition of fascism, of course.) Be true to your art, in other words, and kick Musk and Zuckerberg in their goolies. (Oh right! Like Trump, they don’t have any, at least not in the moral sense.)

***

Comments are always welcome. (Follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Fear the Asian Evil. This last novel in the “Inspector Steve Morgan” trilogy begins with the shooting of one of Steve’s sergeant’s sister-in-law. The investigation leads Steve’s team to a Chinese plan to destabilize the UK in the Bristol port area. Intrigue and suspense await the reader. (And don’t worry: All novels in my series can stand alone.) Available wherever quality ebooks are sold (but not on Amazon).

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Only a few decades ago when the internet was young and made more sense, the PR and advertising gurus who supposedly worked on behalf of authors emphasized two marketing strategies more than others: Get a website and participate in social media.

Obviously, I still have a website. I’ll admit it’s now a bit out of date. I’ve never sold my books (nor Bibles published in China like Trump) nor T-shirts with “In Libris Libertas!” displayed on them (heaven forbid MAGA T’s!). That’s just plain tacky (even in politics!). I update my website’s content as I see fit, only occasionally resorting to the wonderful expertise I’ve found at Monkey C Media, the company that originally designed my website.

But social media for this author? Not so much anymore. Allow me to explain why.

Social media isn’t what it used to be. Zuckerberg allowed Facebook to become the tool of trolls, conspiracy theorists, child exploiters, and many other nasty people, domestic and foreign. Musk bought Twitter and turned it into X, ruining that social media site as well. I apologize to all my friends and followers at those two popular social media sites for leaving them (though they might not have realized I was gone!), but I just couldn’t tolerate what happened to and continues to occur at those sites.

The old warhorses Goodreads and LinkedIn have similar problems. I just haven’t got around to leaving them yet. The first, Goodreads, had some interesting discussion groups that became nasty echo chambers dominated by small-minded autocratic group leaders and their anti-author minions; it got worse when Bezos took over the site (i.e., made it yet another Amazon slave–Thomas Mercer suffered a similar fate, but it was once a respected publisher, not a social media site). Mr. Bezos ruins anything and everything (including his marriage and the Washington Post! In the publishing context, I have other reasons for despising Amazon as well. None of my recent books have appeared on Amazon for those reasons,)

The second “social media” site that’s no longer so social, LinkedIn, seemed a lot more useful at first, again for its discussion groups but also for its “connections” to people working in publishing. LinkedIn’s discussion groups have gone the way of Goodreads’; the connections are still there, but at this stage in my writing career, I need them less than I need more hair. And Microsoft’s purchase of LinkedIn didn’t help, of course. Gates is just another Bezos.

Of course, this website could also be considered social media. I have a contact page readers can use to reach out to me. (Recently a representative from a real English Brookstone family contacted me, for example! That was a pleasant surprise!) Readers can also comment on posts like this one. (Please follow the rules found on the “Join the Conversation” web page. These are designed to avoid the ever-present social-media trolls. If you have some honest observations, you’ll have no problems.)

If you consider that I also write novels and short fiction (I even give away some of these creations—see below) as well as a political blog, that’s enough social media for this busy old author. In other words, I’m not internet-adverse or computer illiterate; I just lack the time and patience to tolerate those who make social media such a hostile place. I participated in the computer revolution as a scientist long before becoming an author, even before today’s trolls were out of their nappies, often wondering as I read scientific preprints why their circulation wasn’t computerized via some kind of email-type dispersal system. (The worldwide web was created at CERN precisely for that reason!) I’ve paid my dues. Bezos, Gates, Musk, Zuckerberg, and other “jolly green giants” of internet exploitation can all go to the social-media hell they’ve created! I won’t accompany them. (Okay, maybe I will. If the old boy upstairs doesn’t serve bacon and Colombian coffee at his boarding house, I’ll think about hanging with that horned guy. At least his fiery breath will make the bacon nice and crispy!)

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules found on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Free PDF downloads. My “discovery” of how easy it is to use Draft2Digital (D2D) to self-publish my books has made my publishing life easier, I still don’t have the time to publish everything I write, not even all the good stuff. And I’ve learned, unlike many who extensively use social media, to be self-critical about what I publish or give away for free: You’ll never see the “bad stuff” because I self-revise and self-censor. You’ll see the free stuff I offer in the list found on the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page. A lot could be for sale using D2D, but my motivation for writing is not to make a lot of money. This free stuff includes two free novels, collections of short fiction, and my course “Writing Fiction,” where I’m brutally honest at times about the writing business (what several social media groups couldn’t tolerate), like in the post above. You can share any of these free PDFs with family and friends. All I ask from those who download them is to respect the copyright. Enjoy.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

This romantic sci-fi thriller is a “bridge book” (see my last post for an expanded definition!). It now leads readers from the “Inspector Steve Morgan” trilogy to the “Clones & Mutants” trilogy. It features some characters from the “Detectives Chen & Castilblanco” series and a few new ones. And like some of my novels, it was inspired by a short story; that tale asked what a future paranoid US government will do when it discovers its aging agents with Top Secret information in their heads start becoming senile. Will they leak that information to US enemies? How can that be avoided?

I wrote this novel long before we had two old senile codgers running for president. Otherwise, the story might have been about them! Of course, their memories aren’t so good now either, at least not good enough to avoid keeping some of those Top Secret SCI documents around to jog their failing memories.

In any case, that’s one theme of this novel and the only one in the short story (which came first). The novel was written, though, to give DHS Ashley Scott a starring role. She’s a secondary character in the “Chen & Castilblanco” tales, albeit often an important one, so I thought it was only fair to give her a leading role in her own thriller. She’d been very patient while awaiting stardom. Of course, I had to put her into some dangerous situations! But my tough female protagonists can handle them!

Ashley is nearing retirement in this novel and feels very alone. That leads to this story becoming a romantic sci-fi thriller in a way like Rogue Planet, but The Golden Years of Virginia Morgan takes place in a much less distant (and therefore scarier?) future: An evil AI is one of the villains, and it makes HAL (the 2001 version, not the 2010 one) look like a wuss. That and other features of the themes and plot make this novel a lot darker compared to Prince Kaushal’s “Games of Thrones”-like adventures as he wins back his planet.

The Golden Years of Virginia Morgan is as dark as the three “Steve Morgan” novels (if not darker) although it’s intended to follow them now on my extended timeline. It’s better as a lead into the very dark “Clones & Mutants” trilogy, which was my intention. All the action takes place in the NJ and NY area while the trilogy hops around a bit (US, Africa, Spain, China, and Korea) as that extended series of novels fills out a timeline covering millennia and heads into the solar system and beyond. Readers shouldn’t ignore this novel for that reason.

But it also treats questions very relevant to today’s politics. No, I’m not a seer who can predict the future, but, as a fiction writer, I’ve studied human nature. It can be very dark! Writing about that darkness can serve as warnings that might create some light. That’s always been one motive for my writing!

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules listed on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

The Golden Years of Virginia Morgan. Virginia is a retired FBI agent whose retirement doesn’t quite go as planned. She gets involved in a government conspiracy run by an evil villain and the AI he has created to do his bidding. DHS agent Ashley Scott and a handsome Latino investigative reporter get involved in many ways, including romantically. “Evergreen” in the sense that the plot and themes are even more current than when I finished the manuscript, this novel is full of surprises. Available wherever quality ebooks are sold (even on Amazon).

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

I’m not talking about weather, although it’s a bear, right? Heat, fires (my home state, California, has been burning), and heat waves have baked the country. As global warming attacks around the globe and climate change does more and more damage, it’s impossible to keep up with all of Mother Nature’s revenge against us.

No, I want to discuss other elements, i.e., have a more esoteric discussion about the elements of writing fiction. (Readers might not care too much—one can argue they shouldn’t have to—but authors must.) What characterizes a good story? A story’s basic elements are: themes, plot, characters, settings, and dialogue. Let’s briefly discuss each one.

Themes. Even the most basic police procedural has a theme, sometimes more than one: drug trafficking, human trafficking, art theft, political conspiracies and malfeasance, legal chicanery, espionage, and so forth. Other themes can be more droll and mundane: religion, marital relations, professional tensions, etc. These themes are needed to wind through and around plots to make them relevant.

Plots. Those plots can range from simple to complex. I prefer the latter, as both reader and writer. (Some genres, like cozy mysteries and sappy romances are boringly simple, though! I don’t read or write those.) You can’t have a story without a plot if want to call your written opus fiction. (In fact, biographies and histories fare better when they follow fictional guidelines.) A good plot makes a good novel; a bad one leads to readers’ boredom…and rejection.

Characters. I’ve read stories that have only one character (more short fiction than novels, of course), but usually there’s more than one, some good, the protagonists (or heroes), others not so much, the antagonists (or villains). A good novel usually has quite a few characters, especially if the plot is complex. The first requirement is that characters should be like real people, not two-dimensional stereotypes. Both plot and characters in a novel must seem real within its settings.

Settings. Your story’s setting or settings (a novel can consider several) can also be simple or complex. It could be Everytown USA or a large city, on Earth or on another planet. Think of your settings as the various stages where the drama and action contained in the plot take place. Like characters, they must seem real (even on that planet far, far away).

Dialogue. Both internal and external, your dialogue should move plots forward. (Internal means what characters think; external means what they say.) A good story has a good mix of dialogue and narrative, with dialogue providing a window to look into a character’s mind, even when spoken. Unlike other elements, it doesn’t have to seem real! A lot of what we say in our daily lives (spoken dialogue) is filled with boring details. “Good morning. How are you doing? Your hair’s all messed up. What humidity, right?” If a conversation at the water cooler extends to five pages of prose in your novel, you’ll lose flocks of readers. (Actually, water-cooler conversations are rare these days because everyone’s looking at their smart phones!)

This post can only be a summary of story elements (which one is more important can depend on a lot of things, including genre). An MFA course or online course about writing could provide a lot more info (a lot of those, like in King’s On Writing, is outdated and/or just plain wrong), but this article should be enough to get a new writer started, or refresh the memory of old hands and remind them about what’s important. (More can be found in the free PDF download indicated below.)

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules on my “Join the Conversation” web page.)

“Writing Fiction.” Most of my free PDF downloads are fiction. This one is about how to write it and how to sell it. It also contains guidelines for what not to do. Most of the material here might clash with what a writing guru might tell you (often while robbing you blind!) because, based on my own experiences, I feel I need to be brutally honest. (And I’ll bet most of those so-called gurus don’t have the experience of writing forty-plus books!) Okay, you might think I’m too brutal, so download it, read it, and use what you think is usable in your writing life. I put quite a few hours into creating this little course—being a professor once myself, I felt obligated to pass on my pain and suffering—and it was fun to write. You might find it fun reading as well. It’s had a lot of updates. (The last ones provide a guide to using the Draft2Digital software—self-publishing is very efficient now; even I can do it!—so critics could say I’m targeting those wannabe authors interested in self-publishing (they would be right!). See the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page for a complete list of free PDF downloads, including this one.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Let me state the obvious: We’re not in danger of creating a real HAL! A takeover of the world by machines who’ll unleash Terminators to destroy all human beings isn’t imminent! While AI is indeed “artificial,” it’s far from being self-aware, true “intelligence”! It barely qualifies as super-efficient and super-fast code, a search engine, version 2.0, that does what you can do any time, maybe all the time, namely, going digital by going out on the internet and exploring databases and websites to gather up all sorts of data and info and organize it into something more logical and possibly more meaningful in the aggregate (emphasis on “possibly”). The only difference? It can that much more efficiently and faster than you ever can.

In other words, the current and very primitive AI efforts amount to information retrieval and organization, not intelligence per se. So, let’s simplify this discussion by calling that software X. (Yeah, I know: X is the new name for Twitter, as if that old name wasn’t already stupid enough. But because Musk’s new toy is just as dumb, I might as well also give AI the more appropriate name X as well. Sorry, Elon, but I don’t have much respect for you and your obvious lack of creativity with names. Space-X is another one.)

People are needlessly worried about X. (Maybe the double meaning now is appropriate?) There’s danger lurking in X, of course, even though it’s not as dangerous as the atomic bomb or global warming. Or even as dangerous as Covid once was after it was (accidentally?) produced in a Chinese lab (a recent NY Times editorial was proof enough for me!), although Xi’s sycophants are using X to create conspiracy theories on the internet as part of their cyberwar on western democracies. Yes, X can be like a dangerous and dumb mafia hitman—anyone with any imagination can imagine so many evil uses for it.

But after all this introduction, the question here is, how can X affect authors and publishers? If X writes a novel in the style of Y (maybe Y = a famous or prolific author—you can pick one of your favs, even me, although I’m not famous) and that novel is published as if it were written by Y, is that a bad thing? Certainly not nearly as bad as HAL (in the movie 2001, not 2010!) or the Terminator (in the first movie in that series!). Certainly not as evil as impersonating a US president who stupidly told US citizens to inject disinfectants as a cure for Covid.

And there’s always something like the Turing test we can fall back on to battle X: How does X write like Y? The software tiptoes around the damned internet for a few microseconds—Amazon is a great hunting ground for books, for example, especially Y’s—and “reads” all of Y’s real opus (i.e. digests previous works known to be Y’s), everything Y has ever written. (If Y = Stephen King, I hope X doesn’t literally get indigestion, emphasis on “literally.”). After determining what Y’s “style” is (for example, if Y = King, “style” means illogical, stupid, gory horror), X then creates a story in that style.

In other words, as far as X “knows” (and judges like Alito and Thomas might stupidly believe), that new work is Y’s. But will any other Y agree with that determination? Will a critic or defender of Y agree? Or even some doctoral student writing about Y’s prolific opus and his style? Or, better still, will even Y agree? I wouldn’t bet on a “yes” answer to any of these questions! (Um, maybe Alito and Thomas’s answers?)

In fact, if Y = King, just for example, maybe I’ll finally like something “he” writes. With him, I rarely arrived at likeability on my reading journey, Misery being the one exception. (Only the title is stupid.) Or if Y = Deaver, I quickly found that Lincoln Rhyme was boring, but Garden of Beasts was entertaining and interesting. How would X incorporate those differences? How might X choose to emulate the better Garden of Beasts than a Lincoln Rhyme book? Today’s software can’t make that determination unless some human tells it to do so!

Of course, the complaints and kudos are about what X eventually produces. The first mostly deal with the fact that some humans will lose money, Y, the author, and his publisher, to be specific. X can’t hurt Y otherwise and might actually improve on Y’s storytelling; i.e., X can surpass Y. Who knows what great novel we’d get if we told X to write a mystery novel about a murder on the seventh planet of Epsilon Eridani in the style of Deaver or King? It could be the greatest sci-fi mystery/thriller ever written in the 21^st century! But it wouldn’t make any member of a Big Five publishing conglomerate rich. That’s the problem with X. Y might not even give a rat’s ass about what X does. (Yeah, Deaver or King might be a wee bit jealous, though.)

Mark Coker (where’s that dude hiding now to count his ill-gotten riches by selling out to Draft2Digital?) never paid much attention to book piracy. All X would be doing is a very clever and sophisticated form of book piracy where it’s Y’s style that’s pirated! We can clean that act up a bit by letting X put its own name on the book as a ghost writer or co-writer and then passing most of the author royalties onto Y. After all, that’s James Patterson’s business model! Hmm…maybe Jimmy and his co-authors are all X’s? Where’s Arnold the Terminator when we need him?

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page. Unless you’re X, of course—you can then go to hell!)

Free PDF downloads. X would have to struggle to write in my style simply because I have more than one. Sometimes, just to make sure a reader is awake (and not Y!), I might change styles within one story. (Those tend to be longish, like a novella or novel.) And sometimes, just for giggles, I play at being X, i.e. emulating myself like an AI! The various versions of me don’t publish everything they write, and some of that I just give away. (Call it a really bad marketing tactic?) You’ll find a list of free PDF downloads on the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page. That list contains several novellas as well as two complete novels. Once you’ve read my freebies, please consider purchasing a few of my ebooks—they’re inexpensive compared to most anything the Big Five produces. Enjoy.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!