Yes, this is the title of three short-fiction collections, one published (even appearing on Amazon!) and two free PDF downloads (see the “Free Stuff & Contests” for these and other freebies). Here though, I’m referring to the necessary ingredients a British-style mystery, crime story, or police procedural must have (perhaps seasoned with a bit of dry Irish humor?).

A body. One might not be necessary, but it’s helpful. It might not appear early on either, depending on whether the victim is a toff or common yob (for the terms, see the above collections), i.e., how it appears might have a lot to do with how the author wants you to feel about the victim. Does the victim deserve their fate? If that’s the author’s intention, they’re still expecting the reader to stick with the investigation long enough to find the culprit and send him to the gallows (older mysteries) or life in the king’s boarding houses (AKA gaol in modern Britain).

A new type of crime? This is difficult. Human beings are inventive, and criminals aren’t as dumb as the police would like them to be, but the most types have been around for a while. The new wrinkle might result when a common but lesser crime, not murder, occurs, or from the various classic motivations of greed or jealousy going out of control. Of course, the new wrinkle might also be found in the person committing the crime, not the crime itself.

The investigation. This is where the detective brilliantly (with ups and downs, of course) battles wits with the culprit or culprits. The investigation is most of the plot, of course, and it might have many twists and turns, all to challenge the detective. They might be an amateur, like Miss Marple—mostly in cozies nowadays—or shrewd professionals who are more clever and inventive than any mathematician because they’re practical and understand human failures.

The interrogation. This is the ubiquitous battle of wits that has mostly replaced the classic Christie-style denouement where all the details of the crime come to light. As such, it’s a lot more interesting. The main character can lose the case or cleverly win it. (The first often occurs a few times as the author presents several attempts by the detective to trap the criminal, catching them in some contradiction or lie. It also provides a great opportunity for witnesses, good or bad, to mislead the detective in the wrong direction!)

American mystery writers’ creations often fail in comparison to British-style mysteries simply because they’re more dependent on action scenes than witty confrontations. One exception is an author who’s better known for his sci-fi than for mysteries: Isaac Asimov was a fan of cerebral mysteries and wrote a few. His main character, Earthman Elijah Bailey, is a futuristic Poirot, a master in trapping the criminal with clever interrogations. Asimov created the subgenre of sci-fi mystery, and no since can compare with his creations in that subgenre.

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Dr. Carlos, Chief Medical Officer. This free PDF download collects together most of my short stories involving Carlos Obregon. While some are standard sci-fi thrillers, there are sci-fi mysteries too. (I also have a few other sci-fi mysteries, and I’m working on a full novel.) The reader may consider all these tales as homages to Isaac Asimov. (I read his The Naked Sun before any of his other novels!)

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

In my novel A Time Traveler’s Guide through the Multiverse, a physicist and her technician “time travel” by hopping from one universe in the multiverse to another, thus allowing me to avoid the paradoxes associated with so many flawed time-travel tales. After one of these “jumps,” they find themselves on an Earth where only androids remain, a version of the completely robotic world envisioned by Aurora’s Spacers in Isaac Asimov’s Robots of Dawn, the third novel in his robot series. (The first two are Caves of Steel and The Naked Sun. All three are classic sci-fi mysteries that I can highly recommend to anyone who truly loves quality sci-fi, not the schmaltzy space operas like Star Wars.)

I probably didn’t do Asimov’s creation any justice, so I must apologize…to his family now, since the master’s gone. The flavor of my portrayal is correct, but one short fiction episode of my novel can’t begin to describe the completely android world the evil Auroran roboticists of his novel desired. They did have a point, though. The puny explorations of our own solar system have largely been made using robots—primitive ones, to be sure, but robots all the same. Why endanger human lives when robots, especially those so advanced as Aurora’s, can be used to colonize faraway solar systems?

Of course, there’s a twist in that episode of my novel that helps answer that question: The main characters, both human, teach the robots something. While my novel is more a sci-fi rom-com and not a standard mystery disguised as sci-fi, Asimov’s answer is more complete if only because he uses a whole novel to support it…or not! (My novel has more fables to offer the reader and therefore more morals as if I were a modern-day Aesop.)

In fact, the meat of my apology to Dr. Asimov is more inspired by the fact that I didn’t put the discussion of this blog post in the end notes of my novel. While some of its sections (“fables”) refer specifically either to historical events (the demise of Hitler’s A-bomb effort, for example) or fictional settings (the android world, for example), I perhaps should have mentioned that the android world was inspired by Asimov’s third novel and not his first two. (Although one could argue that the “moon colony” section was inspired by Caves of Steel.)

Many of the “classic writers” of mysteries, adventure stories (now called thrillers), and sci-fi novels have influenced my stories. Isaac Asimov is probably the most important one. I can only hope that he’d have forgiven me. I did make him almost a god for that android society, after all. (He becomes Sir Isaac Asimov, the “master creator,” along with Hugh Everett III. You don’t know who the latter bloke is? Look him up. He’s important for explaining all the time travel techniques!)

You might wonder if AI, all the rage right now, is mentioned in my novel. Robots and androids are AIs, after all. Yes, an even larger and smarter AI is in my book, but only towards the end. There I might have to apologize to Arthur C. Clarke or Stanley Kubrick, but my AI isn’t named HAL.

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules found on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

A Time Traveler’s Guide through the Multiverse. An applied physicist uses quantum mechanics to create a practical way to do time travel. Aided by her very intelligent technician, the pair take romantic trips to various universes in the multiverse as they explore alternative spaces and times, running into a lot of trouble in the process. This sci-fi rom-com makes sappy and trite adventures like The Time Traveler’s Wife more like fluffy fantasies. Available wherever quality ebooks are sold (but not on Amazon).

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

From the Church’s persecution of Galileo Galilei to McCarthy’s persecution of Oppenheimer and the Good Ole Piranhas’ (GOP’s) persecution of climate scientists later, conservative idiots and fascist politicians have tried to score points and foment hatred by blaming scientists. Politics vs. science has existed for so long that it’s a miracle that any scientific and technological progress beyond that made in weaponry has been made. It’s been an eternal struggle.

I saw some of this on a more personal level during the Vietnam War era. I was lucky enough to be able to take two related graduate level courses at UC Santa Barbara, general relativity and topology—small seminars of five students each with a lot of personal attention provided by two very smart young professors. The physics professor left a considerable impression on me, in particular (although the math professor recognized I had an advantage because I knew physics).

Professor James Hartle, that young physics prof, spent a good part of his academic life trying to unite quantum theory and gravitational theory to obtain a theory of quantum gravity, often working with Hawking. One of his later students once said, “He so easily could have tried to grab some of that limelight that shown on Stephen [Hawking]. He never did.”

As a Cal Tech graduate student, Hartle worked on particle physics with Gell-Mann, though, not general relativity (Gell-Mann discovered the particle classification scheme, known as the “eightfold way,” that is based on the SU(3) symmetry group that has eight generators). But the first thing I learned about him was that he was the graduate student who’d drawn many of the diagrams found in the original second volume of the Feynman Lectures on Physics where Feynman introduced general relativity principles using a linearized theory (in an introductory physics course, mind you!). In my UCSB seminar, we used those lectures as an introduction to meatier material. (It focused more on some classic texts, including Weinberg’s Gravitation.)

At that time, our professor and we students in that seminar had other worries: the Vietnam War was turning UC campuses into hotbeds of protest, mostly peaceful. When we weren’t holding hands in silent protest against the war during lunch hours, the undergraduates among us were worried about being drafted out of graduate school. Professor Hartle had similar worries: He was only an assistant professor at the time, and the US government wanted to draft him! Fortunately, the university went to bat for him: He didn’t have to go. I went on to graduate school and lost contact with this very intelligent fellow, but I later ended up at many scientific events where “everybody knew his name”: Kip Thorne and John Wheeler in New Orleans, Richard Feynman in Bloomington, and so forth. I even tried to keep up with his work on quantizing gravity that he did with Stephen Hawking—mission impossible! I couldn’t spend the the time on it to achieve any real understanding because I was working on other research and teaching.

Professor Hartle was one of the exceptions, a scientist who was lucky enough to get help in doing battle against an uncaring officialdom. Perhaps we can say that he fell “through the cracks”—fascist politicians had a lot of people they could pursue, so Hartle escaped their clutches—but the world of scientific research was made better and greatly improved by his escape, if only for his students that he guided during his long life.

James Hartle died on May 17 in Switzerland. He was 83. He wouldn’t have remembered me, but I will never forget him.

I occasionally review movies in this blog (obviously fewer during the pandemic). I’ve often said that the best ones are based on books (the best of them all is undoubtedly The Lord of the Rings trilogy). But there are inherent limitations found in that transfer of media from the written word to audiovisual film. The mere fact that a movie is usually between two and three hours long means it can’t possibly contain all the nuances found in a novel. Hollywood cuts, edits, and rewrites often damage the novelistic adventure when transferred to the silver screen as well.

But a recent very successful movie shows how Hollywood can even fail miserably at original storytelling—in fact, is more likely to do so because screenwriters aren’t novelists. In this case, not a flop at the box office—lots of moviegoers jumped on the bandwagon!—but in creating anything worthwhile for novel readers who expect a lot more. I’m writing about Barbie, of course. It has convinced me that I never want Hollywood to make a movie based on any of my stories!

This isn’t idle speculation about what I’d do if some producer or anyone else from Hollywood approached me. It’s a raging denial of Hollywood’s storytelling capabilities! You can savor a novel; it’s the product of a creative and inventive artist who is following the age-old tradition of storytelling. Hollywood can’t make anything that can compare with that personal relationship between reader and author because Hollywood is too mass-market; yet most moviegoers don’t read books so their expectations are low, playing into Hollywood’s hands—so when a movie is a flop, it’s really a disaster.

This isn’t idle speculation about any reaction I might have in the sense that some readers have told me that a particular title from my oeuvre would make a good movie. We’ve even discussed who would play whom at times, in particular for Detectives Castilblanco and Brookstone. (The mysteries and thrillers might receive better treatment from Hollywood, but my sci-fi would be far beyond the movie industry!) This is all a frivolous waste of time, of course. Hollywood could never do justice to even the shortest “Detectives Chen & Castilblanco” novel! And the complex intertwining of historical periods found in Son of Thunder (second book in the “Esther Brookstone Art Detective” series), arguably my best and most profound novel, would undoubtedly defeat the best Hollywood screenwriters!

In other words, I don’t want Hollywood to even try! And they won’t either, because they must appeal to a largely illiterate and audio-visually dependent yet passive audience that make few demands on quality but are great believers in hype (as in the case of Barbie).

I’ll make a prediction in this post: Hollywood and audiovisual media will destroy storytelling. Even now, the reading population is biased toward older generations. Younger people have the attention spans, so they passively watch streaming video, mesmerized by an audiovisual experience that’s superficial and far from being profound. It’s only a matter of time until the novel becomes an ancient artifact studied in some halls of social scientists. Thankfully I won’t live to see that occur, but it will happen. The process has begun.

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Son of Thunder. Three storylines come together in this mystery/thriller novel with historical fiction elements about the lives of St. John the Divine and the Renaissance artist Sandro Botticelli and how Esther Brookstone is affected by them. Perhaps this is the novel Dan Brown should have written instead of The DaVinci Code because the history here is fact-based inasmuch as it can be (of course, his isn’t). In any case, you will find Esther’s adventures described here taking her back through centuries of history as you the reader join her on an armchair journey. Available wherever quality ebooks are sold…and also in print!

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

So you’ve written what you believe is the great American novel, penned the biography of your family relative and war hero, or created a theory of everything, and you want to self-publish it. There’s a lot of bad advice out there from marketing gurus to scam artists, all willing to share their secrets if you’re only willing to pay them.

Who can you trust? You might say to yourself, “Well, this fellow is associated with X, normally a reputable source, so their advice must be good.” Wrong! If X is some fellow whose gig on the side is selling his marketing books to would-be authors, don’t use him. If X is any POD publisher (POD = “publish on demand,” the oldest form of self-publishing beyond vanity presses) that advertises on cable channels, don’t use them! If X is any ancient and struggling POD that’s traveling along the road to oblivion (you can determine that by the number of books published recently…if they’ll tell you!), avoid them. If X is any of the tech giants (Amazon, Apple, or Google), run like hell away! And if X is the venerable NY Times, rest assured that they don’t give a rat’s ass about self-published authors!

Most of the advice on how to self-publish a book out there now is bad advice. Here’s a recent example: In the NY Times’s article “A Story to Tell? Self-Publish Your E-Book,” J. D. Biersdorfer uses a half-page of the 8/3/2023 business section to spew forth bad advice about self-publishing. He obviously knows very little about it. He recommends Apple and Google (bad advice), DIY covers (really bad advice), and generally guarantees that your self-published book will be a flop. While that might occur no matter how it is (“gurus” like Biersdorfer never tell authors that there are absolutely no guarantees for making your book into a bestseller, traditionally or self-published), following his bad advice will only hasten the demise of your book. (Generally speaking, the NY Times will have nothing worthwhile about self-publishing to offer authors interested in it.)

Many reporters worldwide know well that if they want to report on what war is like, they must talk to those who are participating in it. The same goes for self-publishing. J. D. Biersdorfer’s qualifications don’t meet that test. He writes computer manuals, maybe even good ones, but he’s not self-published a single book, at least none displayed on Amazon. And most of his manuals are about Apple products (which is why he mostly supports self-publishing with Apple, I suppose). Obviously reporter Biersdorfer has no good advice to offer any aspiring self-publishing author; indeed, one has to wonder about the Times’s editor’s moral underpinnings in allowing such an article, a completely biased travesty, to appear in the Times!

While Mr. Biersdorfer more than mentions Apple and Google, he doesn’t tell you that they’re not aggregators. What’s that mean? It means that neither service distributes the ebooks they publish! Your ebook only appears at the Apple or Google online store! (Amazon operates in exactly the same way.) While you can become your own aggregator, why bother? If you use an aggregating service (Draft2Digital/Smashwords is the easiest to use), your ebook, will be distributed automatically to many online sites selling ebooks around the world. You must pay a bit in royalties for this service, but it’s nothing like traditional publishers take for publishing your ebooks. Either Mr. Biersdorfer doesn’t know about aggregators, or he’s coddling Apple and Google. In either case, forget about Mr. Biersdorfer’s bad advice (here a lack of any useful advice!).

Here’s the best advice I can give authors who are considering self-publishing: If there’s a charge for the advice (in the case of the Times, you’re paying an exorbitant cost for that paper), be wary and take all advice offered with a grain of salt. There are ways to self-publish that are efficient, easy-to-use, and produce a quality product. Do your homework, though. Too many people out there are waiting to steal your money! Once you have a manuscript properly prepared, formatting, publishing, and distributing your ebook is a lot easier than what Biersdorfer says. In fact, once you’ve written and edited a manuscript, most of your work is done. Why do more?

***

Comments are always welcome. (Follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Good advice (or a lot better than the NY Times’s Biersdorfer, at least). My advice for authors thinking about self-publishing is free! Go to the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page and download my short course Writing Fiction. (The parts containing self-publishing advice are generally applicable to book publishing in general, not just fiction books.) My qualifications? I’ve traditionally and self-published (from old PODs to ebooks) since 2006, producing a number of titles that I’m proud to call mine, including those traditionally published ones. Unlike the Times reporter mentioned above, I’ve done it all, so my advice and opinions are based on hard-earned experience. Because I receive absolutely zero benefit for this course beyond offering authors a helpful hand, this little course provides a better launch pad than the NY Times or any how-to article or book on the subject that charges you for the advice! Peruse my advice and please let me know what you think of the course.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

I haven’t been publishing my stories that long compared to some authors (my first published novel, Full Medical, also #1 in the “Clones and Mutants” series, was published in 2006), but there were many more things that concerned me at that time than the so-called “culture wars” (Saudis’ support of 9/11 the terrorists, the Iraq War, a POTUS from the Good Ole Piranhas who now looks good in comparison to the one who lost hugely in 2020, etc.). Nevertheless, from first book to my last one (so far), a celebration of diversity and its importance in our great country and the world can generally found in my prose, so much so that it’s something of a meta-theme. Certain people would now say that prose supports “woke,” a recent addition to American slang that confuses everyone across the political spectrum.

If so, I wear that label “wokeness” with pride. My parents from Kansas went to California during the Great Depression and were always celebrating the diversity found there in that greatest of great American states. (Actually, they celebrated it in their native Kansas as well—their best friend was a Mexican national who went to the same business school in Topeka.) From food to friends, my childhood was defined by my parents’ celebration of the state’s diversity, so it should be no surprise that I also celebrated it as an adult. In my California hometown, my parents’ best friends were an Armenian couple from whom I learned all about the Ottoman Empire’s attempt at ethnic cleansing; the main road in my college town just off-campus was Embarcadero del Norte; my best friend at grad school on the East Coast was a good-natured black fellow from the Dominican Republic, who married a nice Jewish girl—I read one of my poems at their wedding; and through him I met my first wife, a fantastic Colombian lady who passed on far too soon; etc., etc.

I’ve celebrated diversity all my life for so long and considered it such an important part of our American culture that I was surprised that certain scurrilous politicians now use this new term to focus their hatred, racism, and nationalist, isolationist tendencies on their enemies: “woke” recognizes the importance of diversity; “anti-woke” implies that such hatred, racism, and nationalist, isolationist tendencies should be used against any group whose members aren’t far-right white Christian women and men. In other words, anti-woke signifies a desire to have forced apartheid in our society; woke means freedom and respect for all and a celebration of all human diversity.

When Ron DeSantis or any other far-right wannabe dictator (“there were good people on both sides” one said to excuse his bigotry) says that the state or country he’s running in is where “woke comes to die,” he’s channeling Hitler and his use of Jews, homosexuals, and others—anyone considered to be an enemy—as scapegoats to be attacked, imprisoned, and executed…and will do exactly that if ever given the chance! The lesser extremes all too often lead to terrible events too. I can’t watch this going on and not think of the Armenian, Jewish, Cambodian, Rohingya, Uighur and other genocides that have appeared throughout the world. I can’t watch these occurring and not worry that too many politicians are following those same horrific plans made by the monsters of history to use any people perceived as different as scapegoats. It’s terribly sad that we continue to let this occur over and over again. That says a lot about humanity in general and a specific challenge for any democracy. Are we up to the latter? Or will “anti-woke” become the new norm in our sad world?

***

Comments are always welcome. (Follow the rules found on my “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Intolerance. This seventh novel in the “Esther Brookstone Art Detective” series shows that anti-woke can take many forms and isn’t restricted only to the US. Three separate cases challenge Esther and friends here: One involves a whole town’s intolerant treatment of an atheist family; another shows how jealousy turns an old British soldier into a rabid hater of the Irish; and a third describes a right-wing domestic terrorist group’s hatred of refugees and migrants who have come from foreign lands to the UK to escape economic catostrophes and persecution in their homeland. Some of these themes will continue in the following novels in the series, but this one is a free PDF download available on my “Free Stuff & Contests” web page. The novel is a great introduction to the entire series. Enjoy.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Nine Black Robes. Joan Biskupic (2023). “No one should be confident that this majority is done with its work.”—Dissenting opinion, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Thus begins and ends this excellent expose of the fascist takeover of the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) written by CNN commentator and SCOTUS expert Biskupic.

Yes, fascist SCOTUS! Unlike the author, I’ll call a spade a spade, and the SCOTUS’s new majority are rabid fascists who conspire with the Good Ole Piranhas, which include fanatical evangelicals and Catholics, Putin lovers, racists, and bigots, along with many other far-right elements in government. And they are out to destroy democracy in America by whittling away at individual rights, enabling mad-dog gun enthusiasts, etc. by arguing that’s what the Founding Fathers wanted!

Too strong? If you believe that, read this excellent book, and then let’s talk. (Probably too much to ask of MAGA maniacs that they actually read something worthwhile of course. Their fuehrer doesn’t like to read.) It’s a toss-up which group in America represents the most existential problem for American democracy, the climate-change deniers (let them die in the three-digit heat waves and other extreme climate events that will continue to plague the country and the world!) or the idiots out to destroy America by other means. (Of course, these groups have a lot of members in common!)

Here the author knows the law, SCOTUS history, and the ins and outs of the legal issues. She presents the story of how Trump, McConnell, McCann, and other fascists over decades created today’s fascist majority in the court…and she does it well. Although the story is comparable to how Mein Kampf led to Hitler’s takeover, it’s been a much slower one in America compared to Germany, aided and abetted by every conservative president since Reagan. (Of course, “conservative” morphed into “fascist” during that process in American government and elsewhere!)

Today we have the following in that SCOTUS fascist majority: Thomas, who’d be welcome in the Ku Klux Klan; Alito, who’s more fascist than Scalia ever was (and that’s saying a lot); Chief Justice Roberts, who has turned hypocrisy into a fine art; and the two new lackeys of the far right, Comey Bryant and Kavanaugh—all of them rabid Catholic fundamentalists except for Thomas. (Beyond fascism, he just goes along with his colleagues fundamentalism, but you can bet he’d never receive the support of the BLM or #MeToo movement.) These fascist judges will be around a long time, and they’re out to ruin American democracy by legislating from the bench.

The author doesn’t dwell on the obvious solutions required to weaken these fascists’ powers: age and term limits plus increasing the number of judges. The Dems had better control both houses of Congress and the presidency in 2024 so these solutions can be implemented. Of course, the way things are going (SCOTUS doesn’t protect the integrity of elections!), maybe the Dems will never win another election in America if they can prevent it!

So, in brief, this book is a good portrayal of the current SCOTUS, doesn’t use the appropriate word “fascist” to describe the six judges who form the junta basically in charge of the country now, and doesn’t consider the obvious solutions. Perhaps it needs a second volume to do that? Or the author simply accepts that American democracy is dying and doomed, and we can do nothing about it? In this sense, this book is a depressing yet very informative read.

***

Comments are always welcome. Please follow the rules found on the “Join the Conversation” web page.

The Klimt Connection. I don’t write legal thrillers. The nearest I’ve come is this eighth novel in the “Esther Brookstone Art Detective” series where Esther backs an old Austrian Jewish man who is conned into selling his Klimt painting, complete with trial. There are a lot of other things going on, including the introduction of readers to Inspector Steve Morgan who has a secondment with MI5 to bring down a far-right terrorist group. (He soon has his own series!) This is a complex mystery/thriller that has Esther in a case that harks back to her days in Scotland Yard’s “Art and Antiques” Division. Available wherever quality ebooks are sold (but not on Amazon). Enjoy.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

It’s not easy to discover facts about the ancient Celts. Their origins seem to lie in Central Europe. They were pagans…if one can say they paid any attention at all to religion beyond their myths and legends. They didn’t record their history, so the historical records are distorted by others’ descriptions. It’s known that they won important battles against the Greeks and Romans because we have the latter’s (badly biased) records of those events. Bodica later on made the Romans’ miserable in ancient England.

The Roman legions, much more organized than the largely leaderless Celts, drove the latter back to the far borders of their empire. Thus we find Celts in Spanish Galicia, French Brittany, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. Those separate Celtic groups’ dialects evolved into the Gaelic languages we know today.

The biased historical records continued with the Irish monks, Christianity versus paganism now creating the biases. Those monks are justifiably credited with preserving western civilization, protecting Greek and Roman culture and history from the invasions of Viking and other barbarous hordes, but they largely ignored Celtic civilization and history except in their colorful artwork found in gilded tomes like the famous Book of Kells (on display now in Dublin’s Trinity College library).

Recorded Celtic history is even a bit lacking after St. Patrick, i.e. seventh century on, and certainly before with the Viking, Norman, and Saxon influences. The often-quoted adage that the conquerors write the historical accounts to make themselves look good is never more true than with Celtic history. The history of St. Patrick is an obvious example. He was actually a Briton, and not enough is known about his life (there are a lot of legends). Maybe he was indeed once the slave of an Irish chieftain, but it’s certainly not true that he drove the snakes out of Ireland! (There are Irish politicians, after all!)

I hadn’t included much about Celtic history and civilization in my novels until I wrote some recent books. (The starship Brendan in the Dr. Obregon stories doesn’t count.) There’s a bit of that history in Celtic Chronicles (last novel in the “Esther Brookstone Art Detective” series) and the novels in the “Inspector Steve Morgan” series (Cult of Evil, for example) but the lack of reliable historical records is this wannabe historian’s excuse along with a lack of historical training to make all such mentions minimal. In brief, the O’Moore in me failed to spring forth to make my blarney more convincing.

I must say, though, that anyone attempting to write British-style mysteries better realize that Celtic civilization is very much a part of the British Isles background, whether the Brits like it or not. They (most notably Cromwell) might have wanted to erase its appearance in the historical records, but they’ll continue to find that an impossible task, if only for the fact that so many famous authors claimed by the British are Irish! And imagine how intolerable the Brits would have become if writers like Shaw and Wilde hadn’t lampooned English aristocrats and Yeats hadn’t shown them how to write poetry!

Yes, Celtic civilization is part of the British cultural psyche no matter how much they claim otherwise!

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules listed on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

Dr. Carlos, Chief Medical Officer. Lucky you! Carlos Obregon’s adventures as Chief Medical Officer aboard the exploratory starship Brendan (that Irishman is the patron saint of Irish sailors), spread throughout several short fiction collections, are collected together in this free downloadable PDF. You can find it in the list on the “Free Stuff & Contests” web page. (While you’re there, take a look at my other freebies, which include two complete novels!) While the only thing Celtic here is the starship’s name, Obregon’s outlook on life could be considered very Irish. (St. Brendan discovered the New World long before Columbus, even before Leif Erickson. His trip across the Atlantic in a longboat made of animal skins was proven possible years ago, and there are runes in Virginia dating from before the first English colony there that are Celtic!)

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

No, this isn’t one of my political blog posts (see pubprogressive.com if that’s what you like). It’s about villains in fiction—my fiction and others’.

The new Indiana Jones movie has the Alan Quatermain-like Indy battling Nazi villains once again. He’s made a career fighting them. Every sane person hates Nazis. (Exceptions are found among the Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Boebert, Cruz, Gaetz, Greene, and other fascists, of course.) Even Putin used them as scapegoats, comparing Ukrainians to Nazis—quite unbelievable considering that everyone outside Russia knew Zelenskyy is Jewish! (You’d think the Russians would know that too. Or maybe they do, and it’s only a return to their anti-Semitic ways? Stalin-like pogroms anyone?)

Yes, those old Nazis are ideal villains, but a fiction writer has to create period stories to employ them in that way. (Even one of the best sci-fi tales, James Hogan’s The Proteus Operation, which is time travel done right, is a period story.) Hitler and all his evil cronies make great villains. Very few characters, real or otherwise, can be so evil. Their reincarnations depicted in tales about more recent times also provide villains. Neo-Nazis in Rembrandt’s Angel want to establish a Fourth Reich, for example. (Only cartel leaders’ evil can begin to compare—see the same novel.)

As an author, I prefer to use the Nazis as models, and real life now seems to do the same. Putin and Xi are fascists comparable to Hitler, for example (yes, Xi, you are a dictator!), and so I often use them as villains, men so evil that even my arch-villain Vladimir Kalinin hates their guts. (Kalinin appears in many of my mystery/thriller novels.)

Putin is more like a mafia don, though, while Xi is more practical in sagely wielding his dictatorial power in China than Hitler ever was in Germany. Putin, of course, is more like Hitler than Xi; he’s stupid, not clever, whereas Xi is a smart technocrat. (Perhaps his Western education made all the difference?) Yet Hitler is the fascist who blazed the trail for them all. No ethnic cleansing before or after (e.g. Ottoman Turkey with the Armenians and Myanmar’s junta with the Rohingya) can compare to the Hitler’s Holocaust against the Jews.

I feature Putin and Xi, both real-world fascist leaders, as villains in many of my later novels, most recently in the “Inspector Steve Morgan” series. (Putin’s oligarchs first appeared in Gaia and the Goliaths, though, book seven in the “Detectives Chen & Castilblanco” series—that was long before they became such news items.) I will continue to use real-life villains whenever it suits my fancy.

Traditional publishers don’t like authors to use real-life people as characters, but these novels of mine are mostly self-published (all of Morgan’s, for example). Hence I can damn well use them as villains because there’s no way they could ever sue me! (Um, okay, if Trump is reelected, I might be in trouble.) I think that makes these novels (and others) come alive for readers. They relate to our real world today. And their villains are real-life dirtbags, not dead Nazis!

***

Comments are always welcome. (Please follow the rules on the “Join the Conversation” web page.)

“Inspector Steve Morgan.” Last week I featured an evergreen series. This shorter one (fairly new, compared to my others) containing three novels covers three aspects of evil. The first and third feature Putin and Xi as villains, respectively, who cause the clever inspector a lot of grief from their vultures’ perches far away. The direct threat comes from their lackeys, of course. (These villains always like to maintain deniability.) The second book in the series might remind readers of the cults organized by Koresh, Manson, and Jones (a Manson acolyte is about to be pardoned—why, I don’t know); an evil cult leader ruins his acolytes’ lives. Together the novels in this trilogy have enough evil villains to make the reader of mystery and suspense novels forget about Indy and the Nazis for a while.

Around the world and to the stars! In libris libertas!

Amazon has been anti-author/anti-publisher for quite a while (I boycott it as much as possible), belying its beginning as an online bookstore, and it has dragged Goodreads down ever since it was purchased by Amazon. Goodreads has become so bad that even the New York Times is going after it (article in the June 27 edition). That’s not surprising when you read the article. The Times caters to the Big Five publishing consortiums, and the latter’s authors are also getting whacked by trolls on Goodreads as well as Amazon.

In the years before Amazon, Goodreads was a neutral congregating place for authors and readers alike where genre and character preferences were more prevalent than politics and trolling. Many of its groups had lively and interesting discussions about books. I know; I was in some of them. Then the trolls took over. Many groups became anti-author and little personal kingdoms for their authoritarian monitors. I bailed out of a lot of groups when I dared express something the monitors and their toadies didn’t like. Goodreads has continued to be dominated by trolls, as the New York Times’ article proves. And Amazon has done nothiong to stop them.

I suppose the bifurcation of Goodreads and other book discussion groups into warring camps is only a reflection of what’s going on culturally and politically in the US in general, a separation into warring tribes out to destroy the other tribes. Social media has become a dangerous jungle, so Goodreads is not exceptional.

But it never was a good place for self-published authors, and even less so after Amazon took it over. Most of my books are self-published, but my traditionally published ones weren’t received well at all either. And members of Goodreads can opine about any book without even reading it! At least the old Amazon site tries to avoid that; it just follows the old model: Anyone can review a book if they purchased it. Many do, get their one-star troll-reviews published, and then return the book. On Goodreads, though, it’s a free-for-all!

Read the rest of this entry »