Al Qaeda – the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated…
Sunday’s N.Y. Times had a front-page article titled “Al Qaeda Sees History Fly By.” This article is so naïve that it makes me want to cancel my subscription. I suppose the true culprits are the editors who let such an affront to good journalism make it to the Times, let alone its front page. What this article is referring to, of course, is the idea that all the uprisings across the Arab world are generated by ordinary people who have become fed up with authoritarian rule. Al Qaeda has not been present in this process. So far. And that’s the problem. What’s naïve is the foolish thought that they won’t be.
Al Qaeda doesn’t initiate uprisings. It undermines them. It destroys their good intentions from within, turning them to putrid rot. One of the books on my website page “Steve’s Bookshelf,” The Al Qaeda Connection, by Paul L. Williams, shows exactly how this is done. Think about the Russian revolution and the Bolsheviks, the Cuban revolution and the Castro boys, the Venezuelan populists and Chavez—despotic tyrants step in and thwart popular uprisings. The ubiquitous metaphor “jumping from the frying pan into the fire” too often applies. World history is filled with good intentions led astray and thwarted by despots and power oligarchies. Our own American revolution with its many lofty ideals was driven more by greedy businessmen not wanting to share the profits with a tyrannical British monarch.
The problem with the Arab world is even more critical. The people there share a history common to many Third World groups—they have little experience with democracy. Democracy in action is chaotic. When it is at its best there are multiple interest groups trying to be heard, a compromise is brokered, and peace reigns for a blessed few moments in time. The second step is critical and is fast disappearing even in the U.S. where our democracy is being replaced by an oligarchy led by the ruling elites. The local movements throughout the Arab world are united in purpose only until the despot is dethroned. Then chaos will reign and the power vacua must be filled. Due to lack of experience, the most organized group will often win—and that’s al Qaeda.
I’m not talking about traditional al Qaeda leaders. People tend to focus on these decaying husks of humanity. Bin Laden and the other doddering old fools that everyone is after are not the problem. I’m talking about all the young zealots who have graduated summa cum laude from the madrasas and are ready to lead Arabs to a new Middle Eastern caliphate, or die trying. From this cesspool of firebrands and hate mongers new despots will emerge, criminally insane people who will make el-Qaddafi seem like a pussycat. It’s all a process that al Qaeda knows very well—these people are revolutionaries, probably the worst cutthroats (literally) that human history has known—and they will step in to fill the power vacua that the mass exodus of current despots leaves behind.
It’s hard to eradicate pestilence. We got rid of smallpox. Polio still hangs on. Al Qaeda is more like an air-borne and skin contagious Marburg or Ebola. It must be eradicated. There are no redeeming qualities to be found in radical jihadist fundamentalism. But it will infect a young and vibrant political movement the minute it lets down its guard. Power goes to the organized. It’s hard to maintain it in the middle of chaos. Perhaps we can help our Arab brethren do so, but they look upon us and see hypocrites, people who supported the very despots they’re overthrowing. It always seems Americans are continuously saying, “Practice what we preach, not what we do.” Maybe the smart ones among our Arab brethren will go their own way, independent from us and al Qaeda. One can only hope.
The ideology of al Qaeda is clear. This is not Islam but madness. Religion is used as an excuse to exploit, to reduce men to dogs, and to raise madmen to power. Everyone who goes against the official party line that would take us straight back to the Dark Ages of Sharia dominance in the Middle East is fair game to be attacked by the jihadists who have risen to power. There are no exceptions.
Be afraid, very afraid. Orwell’s vision of hell may be only a dim and fond memory if al Qaeda makes the in-roads that I’m fearing. I suggest you read up on Sharia law as interpreted by al Qaeda. It is a murderous tool in the hands of the religious and fanatical despot. Even a fascist can’t like it. I’m sure you won’t either.
March 2nd, 2011 at 8:46 am
That’s everyone’s fear. More-so the Arabs’ fear than anyone else’s. That dangerous malcontents may thwart the collective good intentions.
But there still needs to be a great change like this. People have to try, even if it all goes to hell, for that chance that things do go right.
The good thing about this revolution is that it is neither Islamic nor Christian, nor yet Jewish in nature. The problem with policy dictated by religion is that belief can be a dangerous thing. You could be completely wrong but belief absent scrutiny and critique will keep you convinced that you’re right.
I hope secular governments will spread across the MENA region in short order. However, realistically one must be wary of another Iran-type regime. Noam Chomsky said a long time ago that while Saddam Hussein had to go, the US approach to removing him was all wrong. He suggested that they ought to support democratic forces within Iraq.
Now, forces for democracy within several countries have cropped up. There is so much the UN, the US, the Arab league, the EU, and other nations could do to ensure that the transition has a positive outcome – not for US vested oil interests or strategic advantage or some such thing, but for the good of the people of those countries.
March 2nd, 2011 at 9:40 am
Thanks, Rashid, for your comments.
I came on a little strong about Sharia–modern societies have to be secular, but this doesn’t mean there can’t be moral underpinnings that are cherry-picked from old religious ideas floating around in the background and applied to modern society. We just have to avoid theocracies.
I’m not sure Hussein had to go, or rather, if him, why not all the other despots around the world? Considering what’s happening now, he may have become just another tyrant that bites the dust.
Otherwise, we’ll just have to agree to agree! 😉
r/Steve